Close

Articles Posted in Constitutional rights

Updated:

Stamm Goes On Al Jazeera News to Discuss Missouri v. McNeely

On last Thursday, June 5, 2014, Leonard Stamm went on Al Jazeera America to discuss last year’s Supreme Court decision in Missouri v. McNeely. He was interviewed by reporter John Henry Smith. JHS: Drivers stopped on suspicion of driving under the influence in Tennessee are sometimes forced to submit to…

Updated:

Chipping Away at Our Rights – Deering v. MVA

The Court of Appeals announced its decision today in Deering v. MVA. When a driver is arrested for DUI and asked to take a breath or blood test in Maryland, and the driver’s reasonable request to consult with a lawyer before deciding is denied, the driver may not argue at…

Updated:

Navarette v. California – The Court Giveth in McNeely and Taketh in Navarette

Just last term the United StatesSupreme Court held in McNeely v. Missouri, that a warrant is presumptively required before obtaining a blood sample from a drunk driving supsect. However this week, in Navarette v. California, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, held that a police officer does…

Updated:

McNeely Continued – Warrantless Breath Tests Violate the Fourth Amendment

In Missouri v. McNeely, the Supreme Court held: “In those drunk-driving investigations where police officers can reasonably obtain a warrant before a blood sample can be drawn without significantly undermining the efficacy of the search, the Fourth Amendment mandates that they do so.” At first blush, it appeared the main…

Updated:

Cops Gearing Up For St. Paddy’s Day – Beware!!!

Monday, March 17 is St. Patrick’s Day and the police will be ready so beware. A Prince George’s County Police press release stated: PGPD to Conduct St. Patrick’s Day Sobriety Checkpoint. Last year, nearly 550 drivers were arrested for DUI across Maryland on the St. Patrick’s Day weekend. We’re committed…

Updated:

To Plead Or Not To Plead (Guilty)? – That Is The Question

In Maryland courts, hundreds of DUI (driving under the influence) and DWI (driving while impaired) cases are heard every day. The vast majority of cases are resolved by the defendant pleading guilty on the terms offered by the prosecutor whether the defendant has a lawyer or not. However, in state…

Updated:

Oral argument in Navarette v. California – or – can police stop a car for a crime that can’t be prosecuted?

The U.S. Supreme Court held oral argument yesterday in the case of Navarette v. California. This case presents the important issue of when police can stop a car based on an anonymous tip without corroborating the details provided by the caller. An anonymous caller informed police that Navarette’s vehicle was…

Updated:

Maryland Court of Appeals Hears Oral Argument in MVA v. Deering

This past Thursday the Maryland Court of Appeals held oral argument in Motor Vehicle Administration v. Deering. John K. Phoebus of Salisbury, Maryland argued on behalf of Ms. Deering that Deering’s license should not have been suspended when the police officer would not let her call her lawyer before deciding…

Updated:

Amicus brief filed in MVA v. Deering

The National College for DUI Defense (NCDD) and the Maryland Criminal Defense Attorneys’ Association (MCDAA) filed an amicus brief late last month authored by attorney Leonard R. Stamm in Motor Vehicle Administration (MVA) v. Deering. Deering was arrested for DUI and requested to take a breath test. Before submitting she…

Updated:

Forensic chemist gets 3-5 years in prison for falsifying test results

Annie Dookhan, a former forensic chemist at a state forensic laboratory in Massachusetts, pleaded guilty to 27 counts of falsifying test results, misleading investigators, and tampering with evidence. She was sentenced this week to 3-5 years in prison. followed by 2 years of probation. In the course of her career…

Contact Us